Agenda item

The report was introduced by the Planning Officer who laid out the reasons for refusal as set out in the report.

The following spoke under the public participation at meetings scheme:

·         Jane Newman, Agent

Members agreed that they all liked the clever design of the application, however questioned its relationship to the host building. They made comments on it being confusing to look at and had concerns about the amount of glazing.

Members agreed that a site visit would be necessary to better understand the application.

A motion to defer the application pending a site visit was proposed, seconded, voted on and carried.

RESOLVED:

To DEFER the application pending a site visit[CR1]  to enable members to assess the impact of the proposed development on the house and its landscape setting.