Agenda item

The North Area Manager presented the report and outlined the reasons for approval of the proposal. Minimum clearance of 4,012mm was set in 2023, upon completion and from a survey carried out on site, the actual clearance is 3,870mm. It was noted the existing bridge clearance is lower than the new bridge clearance however there is an incline which may have an impact on longer vehicles. An amended drawing was requested to demonstrate the impact on the clearance of longer vehicles and the neighbour’s effluent tanker. Due to the late submission of the plan, the public consultation period had not ended at the time of committee.

A motion to approve the application in accordance with the officer recommendation was moved, seconded, put to the vote and carried.

RESOLVED:

That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions and provided no new representations contrary to the recommendation are received before the end of the re-consultation period; And that any which are received are delegated to the Head of Conservation and Planning to consider in consultation with Chair/Vice Chair of Planning Committee before issue of the decision.

1.      The development hereby approved shall not be carried out otherwise than in complete accordance with the following approved plans; the ‘Visualisation of Proposed Structure’ drawing No 136126-2885-BAM-0000-DRG-T-LP-040004-P01, the ‘General Arrangement Drawing’ No 136126-2885-BAM-0000-DRG-T-LP 040002 Rev P01, as amended by the drawing titled MAS 25 - TOPOGRAPHICAL AS BUILT SURVEY & BRIDGE SOFFIT CLEARANCES TO A 25M CHORD (received on the 6/7/26) and the ‘Outline drawing – wing wall sheet 2 drawing no 136 126-2885-BAM-0000-DRG-C-ST-043024 Rev P04.1 subject to the following modifications and/or conditions;

2.      The development shall be carried out in full accordance with the existing construction management plans and ecological management plans approved under discharge applications ref NP/DIS/0721/0831, NP/DIS/0821/0918 and NP/DIS/0921/1041.

B Hanley stated one of the parish councillors involved was from Hathersage Parish Council where they sit as a councillor and so abstained from voting.